Saturday, March 28, 2015

3/23/2015 — Boeing Patents Microwave Forcefield — Scalar 101 — 21st century technology rollout | Dutchsinse


3/23/2015 — BOEING PATENTS MICROWAVE FORCEFIELD — SCALAR 101 — 21ST CENTURY TECHNOLOGY ROLLOUT

Boeing patents new instantly forming microwave force field which stops explosive blasts from hitting targets!



Video report here:


http://www.cnet.com/news/boeing-patents-star-wars-style-force-fields/#ftag=YHF65cbda0

Quote the article from Cnet:

"A new patent granted to aircraft, defense and security company Boeing is taking its cues from science fiction. Just like the glowing energy shields seen protecting troops, machines and even spacecraft in Star Wars and Star Trek, the design — named "Method and system for shockwave attenuation via electromagnetic arc" — uses energy to deflect potential damage.

As it is described, the system is not designed to prevent direct impact from shells or shrapnel; rather, it is designed to protect a target — such as a vehicle or building — from the damaging effects of shockwaves from a nearby impact.

The patent is for a shockwave attenuation system, which consists of a sensor capable of detecting a shockwave-generating explosion and an arc generator that receives the signal from the sensor to ionise a small region, producing a plasma field between the target and the explosion using lasers, electricity and microwaves.

This small plasma field would differ from the surrounding environment in temperature, density and/or composition. This would provide a buffer between the target and the explosion that would hinder the shockwaves from reaching and damaging the target."


For the past 4-5 years, I have been fighting an uphill fight trying to get the news out on directed energy weapons.

Specifically , I have been covering the topics of Microwave weapons, weather modification, and directed energy .  Over the years I've come under heavy attack by self professed "professionals" — and I was told that "Scalar" was quote "impossible" — ridiculed by all sides (even much of the truth seeking community).

Now, March 2015, we see Boeing has patented the process of using Microwaves, Lasers, and electrical current to generate a shield of plasma (free floating in the air) between a target , and an incoming explosions shockwave.

They have discovered that two transmitters can induce a plasma arc force field at a distance from the transmission source.  The plasma shield will reflect physical incoming 'waves' from the explosion!

Not just reflecting electromagnetic waves (as we have seen plasma generated by HAARP, and RADAR stations to reflect RF – radio frequency)…… the new Boeing patent actually refers to the deflection of incoming SHOCK WAVES using Microwaves, Lasers (to guide the microwaves), and ultimately a large electrical discharge at a distance from the transmitter which forms the "physical" barrier.

This instantly generated barrier is like an electronic wall built of ions (electrons) stripped from the air — then piled up in front of the object to be protected.

However, instead of the pile of stripped electrons ABSORBING the incoming waves, the plasma actually REFLECTS the waves away.

The electrical discharge is a result of stripped electrons which form in the atmosphere as a result of too much power targeted into a small area.


What is Scalar Interferometry?

To better understand scalar waves, best to hear it in the words of the grand master of directed energy weapons information:


The targeted microwaves literally strip electrons from the air like your kitchen microwave strips electrons from a piece of metal when you expose it to your kitchen unit.  Sparks of plasma form on Tin foil if you put it in your microwave.

The same thing (sparks of plasma) can form using High Power Microwaves targeted at an area in the sky, or as we now see with Boeings patents, targeted anywhere from Ground to space.

As it turns out, the air itself can cause "friction" when something powerful is trying to move through it.

The movement of the powerful beam of microwaves through the air strips electrons like scuffing your feet across the carpet will build up a charge in your body.

The lasers give the microwave a path to follow, as determined by tests done at the US Air Force Research labs.  More on Lasers guiding microwaves here:

The good news with this invention, not only could it block explosion shockwaves, but also (theoretically) could block Sound waves, nuclear blasts, earthquakes, and Tsunamis.

If the plasma from RF (radio frequency) will block physical shockwave blasts from explosives, then it should be able to stop seismic waves from Earthquakes, and large ocean waves from Tsunamis.

Nuclear blasts could be countered by high power transmissions aimed back at the blast?!  By the sound of their patent, yes.

Of course the power to stop a nuclear blast might equal the power of HAARP in Alaska, but a billion watts to stop a nuke might be worth it — don't you think?

This Boeing invention fits in directly with everything I have ever told my audience over the years in regards to what is happening, what is possible, and what is being developed behind the scenes.

The US Navy did this exact same process using HAARP in Alaska, and S-Band 2-3GHz RADAR.   They generated a multiple kilometer wide plasma ring in the atmosphere  , and used it to reflect / deflect incoming waves.


See the video covering the US Navy tests, which produced plasma in the atmosphere using HAARP here:


Curious how this all really works?  Begin your quest to learn here:

http://dutchsinse.com/want-to-know-about-weather-modification-haarp-vlf-hf-and-chemtrails-want-to-prove-it-to-a-non-believer-here-you-go/


Thursday, March 26, 2015

Why Are There No Close-Ups Of Ceres Yet? | Popular Science

Why Are There No Close-Ups Of Ceres Yet? | Popular Science

WHY ARE THERE NO CLOSE-UPS OF CERES YET?

Well-informed Popular Science readers know that Ceres is probably a planet-destroying Death Star. We hoped to get a closer look at the dwarf planet's possible superlaser after NASA's Dawn mission arrived in orbit on March 6. But so far we haven't seen any close-ups of Ceres, and there's a good reason why: the Dawn spacecraft has joined the dark side. Not the Dark Side--just the dark side of this little dwarf planet.

Star Wars jokes aside, rumors circulating in the underbelly of the Internet are saying that we haven't seen any new pics of Ceres because NASA is trying to hide evidence of alien life. That's ridiculous for a lot of reasons, not the least of which is that NASA scientists planned this temporary blackout period years ago. We talked to Dawn mission scientist Marc Rayman about the radio silence, and he explained it all has to do with the spacecraft's crazy path to the asteroid belt.

"This was the quickest route from where we were, which was orbiting around the Sun, to where we wanted to be, which is orbiting Ceres," says Rayman. "It's simply part of Dawn's amazingly acrobatic entry into orbit."

To help explain, I made this handy (simplified) drawing:

Sarah Fecht/Popular Science

Drawing not to scale (not even close).

Dawn launched from Earth in 2007. On its counterclockwise spiral trajectory (shown in red in the drawing), the spacecraft moved gradually farther and farther from the Sun, out past Mars' orbit. This month, Dawn finally caught up with Ceres, which lies in the asteroid belt between Jupiter and Mars. The spacecraft pulled up alongside the dwarf planet, which also moves counterclockwise around the Sun. You can see from the drawing that continuing Dawn's counterclockwise trajectory brings the spacecraft around the side of Ceres that's facing away from the Sun. Not a lot of good photo ops there. And it will remain on the dark side until next month.

Ordinarily it wouldn't take quite so long for Dawn to travel from Ceres' dark side to its bright side. However, Dawn was in a rush to get to Ceres, and it was traveling very quickly. Though gravity and engine braking slowed down the spacecraft, Dawn kept traveling in its original direction for a little while after Ceres captured the probe in its gravitational embrace from 38,000 miles out. As a result of the craft's momentum, Dawn is orbiting Ceres in a high-altitude, slightly elliptical orbit. And at higher altitudes, the spacecraft has to make a larger circle around the planetoid, so the trip ends up taking more time. The high altitude also slows down the spacecraft because the effect of gravity weakens over long distances. For example, the Moon circles Earth at about 2,300 miles per hour, whereas satellites in low Earth orbit travel at around 17,000 miles per hour.

In April, Dawn will move to a lower, faster orbit at an altitude of about 8,400 miles. At that height, it takes 15 days for the spacecraft to circumnavigate Ceres, and since half of Ceres is covered in darkness, half of that orbital period (7.5 days) will be spent in darkness. But as Dawn moves in closer over the next few months, it will travel around the planetoid faster, and the periods it spends in the dark zone will be shorter, but more frequent.

NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDA

This image of Ceres was taken by Dawn on March 1, a few days before the spacecraft entered the planetoid's orbit.

Dawn will send back its next snapshots in early April. It will still be on the dark side then, but it will be fast approaching the bright side--so we'll be able to see a thin illuminated crescent, similar to the photo above, which Dawn snapped before entering Ceres' orbit. Better pictures will come at the end of April, when Dawn moves into that 8,400-mile-high orbit, where it will begin mapping the planetoid's surface. From that distance, Ceres will look about the size of a soccer ball viewed from 10 feet away, but the photos will be three times better than the Ceres/Death Star gif above.

Then, expect the pictures to just get clearer and clearer. By the end of this year, Dawn will orbit just 230 miles above Ceres, and the pics will be 100 times better than anything we've seen so far.

Correction 3/23/2015: An earlier version of this article mistakenly stated the Moon's orbital speed as 1,000 miles per hour. It actually moves at about 2,300 mph. We regret the error.

(Apology accepted)

~A.

NutritionFacts.org research fund and Dr. Greger on organic foods



NutritionFacts.org research fund and Dr. Greger on organic foods
Is this email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.
NutritionFacts.org

Is buying organic worth it?

Dear Adrienne,

One of the most common questions I get when I speak is "What do you think about buying organic?" As with any question like this, I first try to gently explain that what I or anyone else thinks doesn't really matter. What matters is the science: What the best available balance of evidence shows right now. How else could we possibly make decisions for something as critical as the health of ourselves and our families?

I put together a 5-part video series summarizing the best science comparing the nutritional content, pesticide risk, heavy metal toxicity, and food poisoning risk of organic versus conventionally raised foods, including a video on practical tips for making your own DIY fruit and vegetable wash:
  •  Are Organic Foods More Nutritious?
  •  Are Organic Foods Safer?
  •  How to Make Your Own Fruit and Vegetable Wash
  •  Are Organic Foods Healthier?
  •  Are the Benefits of Organic Food Underrated or Overrated?
They are all available right now as a video download as part of my new Latest in Clinical Nutrition volume 24 (all proceeds go to charity). It can also be ordered as a physical DVD. The organic food videos are all scheduled to go up on NutritionFacts.org next month, but you can download and watch them right now.

I'm excited to announce that the downloads are now in HD and have all the chapters marked like in the physical DVD.

The current batch of videos from volume 23 on NutritionFacts.org is set to run out soon, so starting next month and running through June, I'll be rolling out the videos from this new DVD, volume 24. The DVDs give folks the opportunity to sneak-preview videos months ahead of time, watch them all straight through, and share them as gifts, but there is nothing on the DVDs that won't eventually end up free online at NutritionFacts.org. If you'd like the works--40+ hours of video--you can get the complete DVD collection.

Here's the list of chapters from the new volume 24 DVD -- a preview of what's to come over the next few months on NutritionFacts.org:
  1.  Switching from Beef to Chicken & Fish May Not Lower Cholesterol
  2.  Peppermint Aromatherapy for Nausea
  3.  Diabetes as a Disease of Fat Toxicity
  4.  How to Prevent a Stroke
  5.  Formula for Childhood Obesity
  6.  C. difficile Superbugs in Meat
  7.  What Percent of Americans Lead Healthy Lifestyles?
  8.  Cholesterol Crystals May Tear Though Our Artery Lining
  9.  Antioxidants and Depression
  10.  How to Prevent High Blood Pressure with Diet
  11.  Bowel Wars: Hydrogen Sulfide vs. Butyrate
  12.  Are Organic Foods More Nutritious?
  13.  Are Organic Foods Safer?
  14.  How to Make Your Own Fruit and Vegetable Wash
  15.  Are Organic Foods Healthier?
  16.  Are the Benefits of Organic Food Underrated or Overrated?
  17.  How to Prevent Kidney Stones With Diet
  18.  Why Do Plant-Based Diets Help Rheumatoid Arthritis?
  19.  Turmeric Curcumin, MGUS, and Multiple Myeloma
  20.  Dietary Pollutants May Affect Testosterone Levels
  21.  Drugs and the Demise of the Rice Diet
  22.  Diet and GERD Acid Reflux Heartburn
  23.  How Many Glasses of Water Should We Drink a Day?
  24.  Can Oatmeal Reverse Heart Disease?
  25.  Peanut Butter Smell Test for Alzheimer's
  26.  Physicians May Be Missing Their Most Important Tool
Order my new DVD at DrGreger.org/dvds or as a video download at DrGreger.org/downloads.
 
DVD Subscription
If you were a regular supporter, you'd already be an organic food expert by now, having gotten the new DVD last week! I now come out with new DVDs every 9 weeks. If you'd like to automatically receive them before they're even available to the public, please consider becoming a monthly donor.

Anyone signing up on the donation page to become a $15 monthly contributor will receive the next three DVDs for free (as physical DVDs, downloads, or both--your choice), and anyone signing up as a $25 monthly contributor will get a whole year's worth of new DVDs. If you're already signed up and didn't receive your volume 24 yet, please email Tommasina@NutritionFacts.org and she'll make everything all better.

If you'd rather just watch all the videos online as they launch, but would still like to support my work of helping to educate millions about healthy eating, you can make a tax-deductible donation to my 501c3 nonprofit organization NutritionFacts.org using a credit card, a direct PayPal link, or by sending a check to "NutritionFacts.org" PO Box 11400, Takoma Park, MD 20913.
 
NutritionFacts.org Research Fund
Time and time again you've heard me kvetch about the corrupting role money has played in the field of nutritional science. Financial considerations decide which foods get studied, which studies get published, and which findings get disseminated to the public. And when a company funds its own research, you always have to worry if the inherent conflict of interest is biasing the results. That really hit home when I was recording yesterday's video, Nutritional Yeast to Prevent the Common Cold. The video ends with a concern that some brands of nutritional yeast may be contaminated with lead.

What a frustrating experience it was hounding these companies to answer simple questions about the safety of their products. Then I had a revelation: Why not do our own testing? Even if all the companies did get back to me, why should we believe what they say? So I am hereby announcing the NutritionFacts.org Research Fund. Do you eat nutritional yeast? Even if you don't, do you want to know if the companies were lying? Then donate to the Fund and as soon as we've raised enough I'll send off samples from each of these brands to an accredited lab and we'll find out.

Any money left over in the Fund will go to future research projects. Want to know if there are heavy metals in popular brands of amla or turmeric? Should we check Eden Foods preliminary bean results? Check for oxidation by-products in DHA supplements? You tell me! Leave your suggestions and comments on the Research Fund page and we'll post all the results when they come in.
 
Michael Greger M.D.

Michael Greger M.D.

NutritionFacts.org

Updates from NutritionFacts.org

Latest Video


Nutritional Yeast to Prevent the Common Cold
Mar 25, 2015 07:00 am

Nutritional Yeast to Prevent the Common Cold Beta glucan fiber in nutritional yeast may improve immune function but there is a concern about lead contamination in some brands.

 Like Nutritional Yeast to Prevent the Common Cold on Facebook share on Twitter  Google Plus One Button 

Twitter


Copyright © 2015 NutritionFacts.org, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this e-mail because you opted in at our website.

Our mailing address is:
NutritionFacts.org
c/o Michael Greger
700 Professional Dr.
Gaithersburg, MD 20879

Add us to your address book
Subscription Management:

update subscription preferences

unsubscribe

Near collision with Earth eminent!

http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/2015/03/nasa-on-alert-as-huge-asteroid-2014.html