Friday, December 11, 2020

Houseplant Fertilizer Basics: How and When to Feed Houseplants

Houseplant Fertilizer Basics: How and When to Feed Houseplants
Okay, do what's good for the plants - don't guess they are hungry because you are!
https://savvygardening.com/houseplant-fertilizer/?fbclid=IwAR368xXih9DZujuZykk_NygnWUylBt98MbwZ00vnXDCiU9aSUZsrHG9Gnkw

Houseplant fertilizer basics: How and when to feed houseplants

Houseplant Fertilizer Basics: How and When to Feed Houseplants

This post may contain affiliate links. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. Find our full disclosure here.

Being a houseplant parent can be confusing business! Unlike human babies, houseplants don't cry when they're hungry or uncomfortable. Instead, they respond to their environment in different, far more subtle, ways. Knowing when it's time to feed houseplants is challenging stuff, even for long-time houseplant growers. Today, I'd like to review the basic ins and outs of houseplant fertilizer, and cue you in on how and when to feed your houseplants.

When to feed houseplants

Houseplants wilt when they need water. Their leaves grow pale and lanky when they aren't getting enough sunlight. When the humidity is too low, they turn crispy; when it's too high, they may develop rot. But, knowing when your houseplants need to be fertilized is far trickier. There's no clear signal from your plant that shouts "Hey, it's time to feed me!", other than perhaps slowed or stagnant growth, which for many houseplant parents, is barely noticed. So, instead of waiting for a signal from the plant, you'll have to take matters into your own hands and use houseplant fertilizer on a schedule that's based on their growing cycle.

Slow-release fertilizers for houseplants.

The timing of houseplant fertilizer applications should follow the seasons and their growth habits.

Each specific houseplant has slightly different needs when it comes to houseplant fertilizer amounts and frequency, but there's no need to overly complicate the process. Yes, you could study up on each individual houseplant species you care for, determining its specific nutritional needs, but the truth is that the vast majority of common houseplants have fertilizer requirements that are similar enough that treating them in a singular way is more than enough to satisfy their nutritional needs. Some houseplants are heavier feeders than others, it's true. But, a houseplant fertilizer schedule like the one found below, offers a good balance that both satisfies heavy feeders and keeps you from going overboard with those houseplants that require lower amounts of fertilizer.

My Latest Videos

3 Deer-Resistant Perennials

Discover 3 beautiful deer-resistant perennial for the garden.

Here's the best fertilizer schedule for most common houseplants. It's based on the cycle of the growing season, which, though they are inside where temperatures are more consistent, influences houseplants much the same way it influences outdoor plants.

How and when to fertilize houseplants. Tips on choosing the best products, plus a fertilizing schedule. #houseplants #indoorplants

Water-soluble liquid houseplant fertilizers are applied only during periods of active growth.

The best houseplant fertilizer schedule

In a bit, I'll discuss different houseplant fertilizer products mentioned here and how to apply them, but here's the low-down on when they should be used.

Spring houseplant fertilizer schedule:

  • Start fertilizing houseplants about 8 weeks before the last expected spring frost. For example, here in Pennsylvania, where I live, the danger of spring frost typically passes around May 15th. This means I begin to fertilize my houseplants in mid-March. This is when the days begin to lengthen noticeably and houseplants shift from a semi-dormant state into a period of active growth.
  • The first three fertilizer applications should be made at half the recommended strength. If it's a granular product, use half the amount suggested on the label. If it's a liquid houseplant fertilizer, mix it to half strength (more on these two types of fertilizers in a bit). This feeds houseplants at a time when they're really just gearing up for active growth and they don't yet require larger amounts of nutrients to fuel prolific growth.

Summer houseplant fertilization schedule:

  •  When summer arrives, it's time to switch to a more regular houseplant fertilizer program.
  • Base the frequency of summer fertilizer applications on the type of fertilizer you're using.
  1. Liquid fertilizers are applied more frequently, bi-weekly or monthly, for example.
  2. Granular products are used less frequently, perhaps once every month or two.
  3.  Slow-release houseplant fertilizers break down slowly and release their nutrients in small amounts, over a longer period of time. A single application of most of these products lasts for three to four months.
The best organic houseplant fertilizers: How and when to feed your indoor plants. #indoorplants #houseplants

Liquid organic houseplant fertilizer is a great choice because it's made from naturally derived ingredients.

  • Follow this schedule regardless of whether you move your houseplants outdoors for the summer or not. Houseplants are in a state of active growth when summer light levels are high, regardless of whether they're exposed to the consistent temperatures of a home environment or the ups and downs of sitting out on a patio or terrace.

Fall houseplant fertilization schedule:

  • About 8 weeks before your first expected fall frost, taper off your houseplant fertilizer amounts and frequency. At my house, that means starting in mid-August, I reduce the amount of fertilizer by half and start extending the amount of time between fertilizing for about 3-4 applications, which typically takes me to about the time of winter's arrival.

Winter houseplant fertilization schedule:

  • None. Houseplants are not in a state of active growth during the winter and therefore should not be fertilized. Doing so can lead to fertilizer burn and brown leaf tips (more on why this happens here).
Grow big, lush houseplants with this houseplant fertilization plan.

Don't fertilize houseplants, such as this large spotted Dieffenbachia, during the winter when they're not in a period of active growth.

Two exceptions to these rules:

  1. If you live in a climate that does not receive regular winter frosts, continue to fertilize houseplants all winter long, but do it at half the strength and frequency of your summer applications. Again, this is due to light levels more than temperatures.
  2. And, if you live in a tropical climate, where it's warm all the time, keep your houseplants on a summer fertilization schedule year-round.

What's in houseplant fertilizer?

Most houseplant fertilizers contain a mixture of both macro- and micronutrients. The three primary macronutrients, nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium, found in a container of fertilizer are listed as a ratio on the front of the bottle or bag. Called the N-P-K ratio, these numbers tell you the percentage of each of those nutrients inside the container. The ratio of these macronutrients in a tomato fertilizer or a lawn fertilizer is different than the ratio found in a houseplant fertilizer as each of these groups of plants has different nutritional needs. This means using a fertilizer formulated specifically for houseplants is a must. That should be the first thing you look for when purchasing houseplant fertilizer. It should say "for houseplants" somewhere on the packaging.

Fertilizer for flowering houseplants.

The ratio of N-P-K is on the label of every houseplant fertilizer. This one is higher in P, making it good for blooming plants like African violets.

Phosphorous (the middle number on the container) is essential for flowering. Houseplant fertilizers for flowering plants should have a slightly higher amount of phosphorous in them (1-3-1, for example). Those used on green houseplants that don't typically produce flowers, should be slightly higher in nitrogen. They may also contain a balanced ratio of nutrients (5-3-3 or 5-5-5, for example). I typically use one houseplant fertilizer for my flowering houseplants and a separate one for non-flowering types. This isn't necessary unless you're growing flowering houseplants like African violets, begonias, or gloxinia.

Many, but not all, fertilizers also contain secondary macronutrients, like calcium and magnesium, as well as micronutrients, such as iron, zinc, and boron. These nutrients are used in smaller amounts than the primary macronutrients of N, P, and K, but they are still essential to every plant's metabolic pathway. You'll want to be sure your houseplant fertilizer contains a small amount of these nutrients as well.

A schedule for feeding houseplants all year long. #houseplants #indoorplants

Houseplants won't tell you when they need to be fertilized, so you'll need to put them on a schedule.

Ingredients in houseplant fertilizers

The ideal houseplant fertilizer is made from naturally derived sources of these macro- and micronutrients, not made from chemicals synthesized in a laboratory. Though those blue, water-soluble fertilizers are commonly recommended, they aren't  the most eco-friendly source of nutrition for your plants, nor do they contain any micronutrients. Instead, turn to either a liquid or granular houseplant fertilizer made from natural ingredients to feed your houseplant babies.

Natural, organic fertilizers for houseplants

Organic plant fertilizers are made from plant-, animal-, and mineral-based components.

Types of houseplant fertilizer

Now that you know when to fertilize houseplants and what nutrients houseplant fertilizers should contain, it's time to look at the different types of houseplant fertilizer to determine which one is right for you.

Liquid houseplant fertilizer

They need to be used a bit more frequently than granular fertilizer, but organic liquid houseplant fertilizers are my personal favorites. Brands like Grow!, Espoma's Indoor Houseplants, Liquid Love, and Jobes Water-soluable All-Purpose Fertilizer contain ingredients derived from plants and animals, as well as from mined minerals. Liquid fertilizers also come with a reduced risk of fertilizer burn. Another benefit of using liquid fertilizers made from naturally-occurring ingredients is that in addition to providing a houseplant with nutrients, they also act as growth enhancers. They are full of dozens of micronutrients, trace elements, vitamins, amino acids, and plant hormones, each of which plays a vital role in the health and vigor of your houseplants.

Organic liquid houseplant fertilizers are made from liquid kelp, fish emulsion, compost tea, worm tea, liquid bone meal, rock phosphate, plant extracts, and humic acids, to name just a few.

Water-soluble fertilizer choices.

Liquid and water-soluble houseplant fertilizers are mixed with irrigation water and applied to plants.

Granular houseplant fertilizer

Granular fertilizers for houseplants are found in one of two formulations: as loose, granular pellets or as compressed fertilizer "spikes." Pelletized granular fertilizers for houseplants, such as Organic Plant Magic and Be-1, are sprinkled on the surface of the soil. Compressed fertilizer "spikes," such as Jobes Organic and EarthPods, are pushed down into the soil to come in close contact with plant roots.

The best pelletized and compressed granular houseplant fertilizers are made from naturally derived ingredients. These include dehydrated worm castings, bone meal, blood meal, sulfate of potash, limestone, rock phosphate, and other animal-, mineral-, and plant-based ingredients. Synthetic chemical-based granular fertilizers are available for houseplants, too, though I avoid them. A quick check of the ingredient list on the label tells you what the fertilizer is made from. If you don't see any ingredient list at all, it's a synthetic fertilizer.

Spikes are a great way to feed houseplants.

Houseplant fertilizer spikes are easy to insert into the soil.

Slow-release houseplant fertilizers

Also called time-released fertilizers , slow-release houseplant fertilizers are made from a synthetic source of nutrients. The liquid nutrients are encapsulated in a coating. This coating breaks down slowly and releases the nutrients in low doses over a long period of time. Products like these mean you'll be fertilizing less frequently. It's very convenient, but do be aware that they aren't made from eco-friendly ingredients.

Types of houseplant fertilizers: Liquid, Granular, and Slow-release

The coating on slow-release fertilizers mean the nutrients are available to plants for a long period of time. However, they are chemically derived.

Houseplant fertilizer in a nutshell

As you can see, fertilizing houseplants doesn't have to be an overly complex practice. Use the right products and apply them according to a seasonal schedule, and your houseplant family will be as happy and healthy as can be.

For more on houseplants, check out the following articles:
Apartment Plants: The best houseplants for apartment living
Fertilizer numbers and what they mean
Air Plant Care: How to tend, water, and fertilize Tillandsia
Tips for repotting a Phalaenopsis orchid
The best low light succulents

How do you feed your houseplants? We'd love to hear about it in the comment section below.

Pin it!

Fertilizing houseplants is essential, if you want to grow happy, healthy indoor plants. These houseplant fertilizer basics teach you how and when to feed your indoor plants, and the best products to use for the job. #houseplants #indoorgardening #houseplantlove

Related Posts



~A.

Pharma lobby poured millions into ‘dark money’ groups influencing 2020 election • OpenSecrets

Pharma lobby poured millions into 'dark money' groups influencing 2020 election • OpenSecrets

Pharma lobby poured millions into 'dark money' groups influencing 2020 election

Screengrab from American Action Network ad " Breakthroughs" – Captured via YouTube

Pharmaceutical companies' top lobbying group funneled millions of dollars to prominent "dark money" groups that pushed industry friendly messages to lawmakers and 2020 voters. 

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America raised nearly $527 million last year and spent roughly $506 million, new tax returns obtained by OpenSecrets reveal. That's a record haul for the organization, which is funded by the world's most powerful pharmaceutical companies.

The trade association made its largest political donation of 2019 — $4.5 million — to the American Action Network, a dark money group that backs House Republicans. The conservative nonprofit and its pharmaceutical industry donor share disdain for proposals to regulate the price of prescription drugs. 

The same year it received PhRMA's donation, the American Action Network launched several multi-million dollar ad campaigns opposing President Donald Trump's proposal to let Medicare negotiate drug prices. This year, the group launched multi-million dollar ad campaigns opposing House Democrats' bill to lower drug prices and ads boosting vulnerable Republicans who supported an alternative bill considered much friendlier to drugmakers. 

The alliance between drugmakers and GOP groups isn't new. PhRMA has given $14.6 million to the American Action Network since 2016. In that time, the American Action Network became a major contributor to GOP causes. During the 2020 election cycle, it gave $26.4 million to the Congressional Leadership Fund, the House Republicans' top super PAC that helped unseat several freshman Democrats.

In several key 2020 races, the American Action Network battled with a Democratic group that also received funding from drugmakers. PhRMA gave nearly $1.6 million to Center Forward, a dark money group aligned with moderate Blue Dog Democrats, last year. That nonprofit provided most of the funding for an allied super PAC that spent $3.3 million supporting House Democrats. The pharma-backed GOP and Democratic groups went head-to-head in several key House races, including a tightly contested New York race that has come down to a handful of votes.

Late last year, as Congress debated drug pricing bills, Center Forward flew House staffers to San Francisco to meet with drug company executives. The nonprofit's board members have also lobbied for pharmaceutical interests. Republicans in Congress are the most vocal opponents of efforts to have the government regulate drug prices — a measure that would damage drugmakers' profits — but Blue Dog Democrats also pushed back on more aggressive proposals to lower drug prices.

Drugmakers bankroll groups pushing industry talking points to Trump

Prominent drugmakers have spent much of 2020 developing vaccines to fight COVID-19, and the threat of drug pricing legislation in Congress has died down amid the pandemic. But Trump has continued to push forward with executive actions on prescription drugs opposed by the pharmaceutical industry. 

PhRMA deployed creative tactics in an attempt to persuade Trump against following through on his campaign promise to aggressively lower drug prices. During the Trump era, the trade association has bankrolled conservative groups that have access to the president. 

The American Conservative Union, which hosts the annual Conservative Political Action Conference, received $150,000 from PhRMA in 2019. Led by Trump ally and corporate lobbyist Matt Schlapp, the conservative nonprofit launched the Coalition Against Socialized Medicine late last year to oppose efforts to regulate drug prices and enact single-payer health care proposals. 

Nearly all of the coalition's members received funding from drugmakers within the last two years. Big pharma's trade group gave $505,000 to American Commitment, $78,500 to Americans for a Balanced Budget and $60,000 to the Taxpayers Protection Alliance last year alone, according to new tax returns. The Taxpayers Protection Alliance launched a six-figure ad campaign last month aimed at killing "surprise" medical billing legislation and calling it a "handout" to big insurance companies.

New tax returns also show that pharmaceutical manufacturers' trade group gave $200,000 to the National Sheriffs Association, a nonprofit representing thousands of law enforcement officials. The group launched a six-figure ad campaign last year warning against Trump's proposal to import drugs from foreign countries, a measure bitterly opposed by drugmakers. Those ads specifically targeted Trump, airing in Washington, D.C., on his favorite Fox News programs.

Trump ultimately approved a plan to import drugs from Canada in September, but its scope was limited. He also moved ahead with a rule that would allow Medicare to negotiate the cost of drugs based on the price foreign governments pay, another measure strongly opposed by drugmakers. 

Still, while Trump has moved ahead with industry-opposed measures, his GOP allies in Congress have not made drug pricing legislation a priority. Republican lawmakers and their aides are consistently fed opinion pieces and ad campaigns from conservative groups urging them to reject "socialist price controls."

Republicans ran political ads in 2020 that mirrored talking points from major healthcare industry players. Super PACs aligned with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) attacked Democrats' over their support for a public health insurance option, a proposal that could hurt drugmakers' profits. Those ads cited a study from the Partnership For America's Health Care Future, a conglomerate of insurers, hospitals and pharmaceutical companies that received $300,000 from PhRMA last year.

Longtime pharmaceutical ally gets seven-figure gift in retirement 

One of PhRMA's largest 2019 gifts was a $2 million donation to the Orrin Hatch Foundation, a think tank and research library launched by former Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). The trade group gave $140,000 to the foundation between 2017 and 2018. 

Hatch, who retired in January 2019, was known as the pharmaceutical industry's "man on the Hill" by the end of his 42-year tenure. Hatch helped shape current laws that regulate generic drugs and opposed measures to limit drugmakers' monopoly protections. As chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Hatch was considered the major roadblock to drug pricing changes proposed by Democrats and Trump. 

The pharmaceuticals and health products industry gave $2.8 million to Hatch's campaign committee since 1998, more than any member of Congress who didn't run for president. When Hatch faced a primary challenge in 2012, PhRMA gave $750,000 to a super PAC boosting his reelection campaign. 

During Hatch's final years in office, his allies reportedly asked pharmaceutical companies and K Street lobbyists for donations to fund the Orrin Hatch Foundation. In 2018, the foundation invited major corporations, including pharmaceutical giant Merck, to a luxury mountain resort for a fundraiser.

While the foundation will serve as a library to catalogue Hatch's government service and provide civic education, it has also put out policy reports on pressing issues. Its most recent report delves into how lawmakers can craft "sensible solutions to both foster innovative biologics and curb skyrocketing drug prices."

Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit the Center for Responsive Politics.
For permission to reprint for commercial uses, such as textbooks, contact the Center: info@crp.org
Read more OpenSecrets News & Analysis: Pharmaceutical/Health products

Support Accountability Journalism

At OpenSecrets.org we offer in-depth, money-in-politics stories in the public interest. Whether you're reading about 2020 presidential fundraising, conflicts of interest or "dark money" influence, we produce this content with a small, but dedicated team. Every donation we receive from users like you goes directly into promoting high-quality data analysis and investigative journalism that you can trust. Please support our work and keep this resource free. Thank you.

About The Author

Karl joined the Center for Responsive Politics in October 2018. As CRP's money-in-politics reporter, he writes and edits stories for the news section and helps manage a team of diligent writers. A native of Brooklyn, New York, Karl graduated from State University of New York at New Paltz in 2016 with a B.A. in journalism. He previously worked at The Globe, a regional newspaper based in Worthington, Minnesota. His email is kevers@crp.org.



~A.

Senate restores FEC as agency confronts massive backlog of cases • OpenSecrets

Senate restores FEC as agency confronts massive backlog of cases • OpenSecrets
Holy, friggin' moly Batman - where did the election disappear to?
https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2020/12/fec-restored-by-senate

Senate restores FEC as agency confronts massive backlog of cases

Federal Election Commission
The Federal Election Commission will finally have six members after Wednesday's Senate vote. (Sarah Silbiger/CQ Roll Call)

The U.S. Senate confirmed three new members to the Federal Election Commission Wednesday, finally giving the agency enough commissioners to enforce campaign finance laws after leaving it powerless throughout much of the 2020 election cycle. 

The FEC has been without a quorum since July 4 due to retirements that left the commission with only three members out of the usual six. With three new commissioners confirmed, the FEC can again conduct meetings, change existing rules and pursue allegations of campaign finance violations. 

The Senate confirmed Republican Sean Cooksey, general counsel to Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Republican Allen Dickerson, legal director of the Institute for Free Speech, and Democrat Shana Broussard, counsel to FEC commissioner Steven Walther. The FEC, which cannot have more than three members from the same party, will have three Republicans, two Democrats and one independent in Walther, who typically votes with the Democrats. 

President Donald Trump nominated Dickerson in June. He nominated Broussard and Cooksey in October. Presidents typically nominate FEC nominees in bipartisan pairs with input from party leaders in the Senate. 

Broussard's nomination sailed through the Senate 92-4. She will be the first Black FEC commissioner. Dickerson's nomination narrowly passed 49-47 amid Democratic opposition — Democrats have criticized Dickerson over his efforts to deregulate campaign finance — while Cooksey's nomination passed 50-46.

The road ahead won't be easy for the revived commission. The FEC faced a backlog of 388 enforcement cases as of Sept. 30, according to a recent report from the commission's lawyers. Those include complaints of alleged campaign finance violations in the 2020 election, which saw an estimated $14 billion in total spending. 

Broussard, the incoming commissioner with FEC experience, said during a Senate Rules Committee meeting last month she would prioritize addressing important cases that are set to expire due to the agency's statute of limitations. The FEC's most recent enforcement report found that 115 cases will expire soon.  

Commissioners are also tasked with changing outdated rules. Before the FEC lost its quorum, commissioners were debating how best to update disclaimer requirements for digital ads and took comments about a loophole that allowed Michael Bloomberg to transfer $18 million of his own money to the Democratic National Committee after suspending his self-funded presidential campaign. Good government groups are also pushing the FEC to address the massive influx of "dark money" and close loopholes that allow super PACs to avoid disclosing their donors before Election Day. 

Revived commission likely to be divided

It's unclear whether the six commissioners will find common ground. They generally haven't over the last decade. Republican commissioners have typically voted against measures to strongly enforce campaign finance law, even when Democratic candidates are accused. 

Any action requires four affirmative votes, and the FEC often "deadlocks" 3-3 with Democrats voting to pursue investigations and Republicans voting to dismiss the cases. As a result, the FEC has been unable to crack down on dark money and widespread coordination between candidates and big-money outside groups in the post-Citizens United era. 

Issue One, a cross-partisan organization that advocates for stronger campaign finance laws, voiced concerns about the Republican FEC nominees. Dickerson has consistently opposed laws attempting to reveal donors to dark money groups and has argued against contribution limits in court.

"Without a commitment from each FEC commissioner to enforce the laws on the books, the agency is likely to be mired in deadlock and dysfunction, despite regaining a quorum," Issue One Executive Director Meredith McGehee said in a statement.

Earlier this year, the Senate confirmed another frequent defender of dark money, Republican election lawyer Trey Trainor, to the FEC. As chair of the commission — the position rotates each year — Trainor recently made baseless claims of fraud in the 2020 election, echoing Trump.

This story was edited on Dec. 10 to remove a sentence stating that online ads are not currently regulated by election laws. Election laws apply to online ads but regulations have not been updated to provide clear disclaimer rules.

Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit the Center for Responsive Politics.
For permission to reprint for commercial uses, such as textbooks, contact the Center: info@crp.org
Read more OpenSecrets News & Analysis: Campaign finance

Support Accountability Journalism

At OpenSecrets.org we offer in-depth, money-in-politics stories in the public interest. Whether you're reading about 2020 presidential fundraising, conflicts of interest or "dark money" influence, we produce this content with a small, but dedicated team. Every donation we receive from users like you goes directly into promoting high-quality data analysis and investigative journalism that you can trust. Please support our work and keep this resource free. Thank you.

About The Author

Karl joined the Center for Responsive Politics in October 2018. As CRP's money-in-politics reporter, he writes and edits stories for the news section and helps manage a team of diligent writers. A native of Brooklyn, New York, Karl graduated from State University of New York at New Paltz in 2016 with a B.A. in journalism. He previously worked at The Globe, a regional newspaper based in Worthington, Minnesota. His email is kevers@crp.org.



~A.