Monday, November 07, 2022

n o n p a r t i s a n

Want to know what's on your ballot? Use Ballotpedia's Sample Ballot tool
https://ballotpedia.org/Nonpartisan

Nonpartisan


Election Policy Logo.png

Ballot access policy
Voting policy
Redistricting policy
Election dates
Election agencies
Election terms
Public Policy Logo-one line.png

The term nonpartisan is generally used in one of two ways. In the stricter sense, which is used by some government agencies (such as the Federal Election Commission and the Internal Revenue Service), the term nonpartisan may be used to describe a group or individual that does not expressly support one political party or candidate over another. More broadly, the term nonpartisan may sometimes be used to describe a group or individual that does not promote a particular political ideology.[1][2]

For example, consider the following two organizations: the American Legislative Exchange Counciland the Center for American Progress. Both organizations describe themselves as nonpartisan. In the stricter sense of the term, that is correct; neither supports or advocates for one political party over another. In the broader sense, however, some may not consider these organizations to be nonpartisan because they espouse political ideologies. The American Legislative Exchange Council is regarded as a conservative organization "dedicated to the principles of limited government, free markets, and federalism." Meanwhile, the Center for American Progress describes itself as being dedicated to "bold, progressive ideas."[3][4]


Sunday, November 06, 2022

Avril Haines director of national intelligence

"To be effective, the DNI must never shy away from speaking truth to power — even, especially, when doing so may be inconvenient or difficult. To safeguard the integrity of our Intelligence Community, the DNI must insist that, when it comes to intelligence, there is simply no place for politics — ever."


NAESB Gas-Electric Forum | November 8, 2022 | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

about to start:

NAESB Gas-Electric Forum | November 8, 2022

​​At the urging of FERC Chairman Rich Glick and North American Electric Reliability Corporation President and CEO Jim Robb, the North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) is convening a multi-meeting forum to identify solutions to the reliability challenges facing the nation's natural gas system and bulk electric system.

In a joint letter dated July 29, 2022, Glick and Robb recommended that NAESB convene the forum, as outlined in one of the key recommendations from the FERC-NERC report on the February 2021 freeze in Texas and the South Central U.S. caused by Winter Storm Uri.


NAESB Forum Information

The meetings of this NAESB forum are open to the public. To participate, please register through the following hyperlink: TBD

When registering, you will be asked to provide your name, company, phone number and email address, and instructions for participation will be provided to you in a separate email confirmation notice after you register.  All those that register for the meeting will be added to the NAESB Gas-Electric Harmonization Forum distribution list unless it is specifically requested otherwise.  If you received this notice and would like to be removed from the distribution list, please contact the NAESB office.  If you know of any colleagues that may have interest in attending this meeting or in following NAESB efforts in this area, please feel free to forward this invitation.  Prior to this meeting and any future meetings, participants are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the NAESB Antitrust and Other Meeting Policies (http://www.naesb.org/misc/antitrust_guidance.doc) and be aware that the meetings will be transcribed/recorded and may be attended by members of the press.

NAESB Gas Electric Forum Work Plan

Key Recommendation 7 Directive:

"The time has come for a concerted effort among those who can address the natural gas-electric infrastructure interdependency problem to consider the topics set forth above [below], or other topics of their own choosing."[1]

Forum Outcome Goals:

  • Concrete actions to increase reliability of the natural gas infrastructure system necessary to support [the] Bulk Electric System
  • Plans for implementing actions
  • Deadlines for implementing actions
  • Identifying entities responsible for implementing actions

Process Description

Meetings will be held via the Zoom platform on dates specified in the meeting schedule, and all meetings will be recorded: https://www.naesb.org/pdf4/geh_schedule_090722.docx(link is external)

Participation in the meetings is open to all interested parties, and registration for each meeting is required

An opportunity to submit topic specific recommendations and comments prior to each meeting will be provided via an electronic survey, if appropriate, and all submissions will be made publicly available. A general agenda for each meeting specifying the topic(s) of discussion will be released two weeks prior to the meeting date, and all work papers and revisions to agendas will be posted at least three business days before each meeting

Participants will have a minimum of five business days to respond to requests for recommendations and comments, and all submissions will be due at least one week prior to each meeting.

Participants must identify with a NAESB Quadrant and Segment or as a non-voting observer when registering for meetings.  Any voting will be conducted utilizing the NAESB Balanced Voting Procedures and all votes will be made publicly available: https://www.naesb.org/pdf4/geh_balanced_voting_quadrant_segment_descriptions.doc(link is external)

A meeting summary and any resulting documentation will be provided the week following the meeting.

Categories Identified by FERC and NERC Staff[2]

  1. Measures to improve gas-electric information sharing for improved system performance during extreme cold weather emergencies
  2. Measures to improve reliability of natural gas facilities during cold weather (freeze protection, electric supply)
  3. Measures to improve the ability of generators to obtain fuel during extreme cold weather events when natural gas heating load and natural gas-fire generators are both in high demand for natural gas, at the same time that natural gas production may have decreased
Topics by Category as Identified by FERC and NERC Staff
Schedule of Meetings
Joint FERC-NERC Letter to NAESB

[2] See slide 10 of the August 30, 2022 FERC and NERC Presentation: https://www.naesb.org/pdf4/geh083022a1.pdf

​​



Multistate lawsuits against the federal government during the Biden administration - Ballotpedia

just curious,,,

Multistate lawsuits against the federal government during the Biden administration

This page includes an overview of notable multistate lawsuits filed against the federal government during President Joe Biden's (D) administration. Multistate lawsuits are legal actions involving two or more state attorneys general. As of October 29, 2022, 55 multistate lawsuits had been filed against the Biden administration. Five of these lawsuits challenged regulations established during the Trump administration.[1][2]

For information about lawsuits filed against the Trump administration from 2017 to 2021, click here.

This page contains the following sections:

  • Noteworthy multistate lawsuits against the Biden administration
  • List of multistate lawsuits against the Biden administration
  • Multistate lawsuits by administration, 1981-2021

Noteworthy multistate lawsuits against the Biden administration

The following multistate lawsuits gained national attention in the media or became major issues in the course of a political campaign. Details on the lawsuits are organized by topic.

Coronavirus

Georgia v. Biden

  • Administration action: President Joe Biden (D) issued an executive order on Sept. 9 requiring all employees of federal contractors be vaccinated against the coronavirus by Jan. 18, 2022.[3]
  • Lawsuit: Seven states, led by Georgia, filed a lawsuit against Biden. The plaintiffs said the rule violated federal procurement power and was not within the federal government's authority. The case is on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.[1]
  • States: Georgia, Alabama, Idaho, Kansas, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia

Louisiana v. Becerra

  • Administration action: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued an emergency regulation on November 4, 2021, that would require vaccinations of eligible staff at healthcare facilities that participate in the Medicare or Medicaid programs.
  • Lawsuit: Fourteen states, led by Louisiana, filed a lawsuit against the CMS and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The plaintiffs argued the rule "exceeds CMS's statutory authority; violates the Social Security Act's prohibition on regulations that control the selection and tenure of healthcare workers; is arbitrary and capricious; and violates the Spending Clause, the Anti-Commandeering doctrine, and the Tenth Amendment."[1]
  • States: Louisiana, Montana, Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio

Texas v. U.S. Department of Labor

  • Lawsuit: Five states, led by Texas, filed a lawsuit against OSHA and the U.S. Department of Labor on November 5, 2021. The plaintiffs' motion to stay argued the rule exceeded OSHA's scope of authority and its enactment violated administrative law standards.[4][5]
  • States: Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Utah

Energy and environment

Texas v. Biden: Keystone XL pipeline

  • Administration action: Biden issued an executive order January 20, 2021, that revoked the presidential permit granted to TransCanada Keystone Pipeline to construct or operate pipeline facilities between the United States and Canada.
  • Lawsuit: Twenty-one states, led by Texas and Montana, filed a lawsuit against Biden and his administration on March 17, 2021. The lawsuit said the permit revocation was a regulation of interstate and international commerce and, therefore, subject to congressional not executive authority. States not directly affected by the proposed path for the pipeline said its rejection would also have a negative ripple effect on the economy of non-pipeline states.[6]
  • Status: The U.S. District Court for the South District of Texas granted a federal motion to dismiss on grounds of mootness.
  • States: Montana, Texas, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missisippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, West Virginia, Wyoming. Alaska and Florida subsequently joined the case.

Missouri v. Biden: Executive order on social costs of greenhouse gases

  • Administration action: Biden issued an executive order on January 20, 2021, that called on agencies to account for the social cost of greenhouse emissions. "An accurate social cost is essential for agencies to accurately determine the social benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions when conducting cost-benefit analyses of regulatory and other actions," the executive order said.
  • Lawsuit: Twelve states, led by Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt (R), filed a lawsuit against Biden on March 8, 2021. The lawsuit argued that the executive branch had assumed legislative power in attempting to define the social costs of greenhouse gases. The lawsuit said the Biden administration violated the separation of powers.[7]
  • States: Missouri, Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Utah

List of multistate lawsuits against the Biden administration

The following table provides a list of lawsuits against the Biden administration involving two states or more. It also includes the date the action was initiated, the number of states involved, the docket or citation number, and the status of the case. This information was originally compiled by the State Litigation and AG Activity Database.[1]

This table was last updated on October 29, 2022.

Overview of multistate lawsuits against the federal government
Case Date filed Number of states Docket or citation Status
Nebraska v. Biden September 29, 2022 6 4:22-cv-01040 Emergency injunction issued (10/21/22)
Morehouse Enterprises v. ATF July 27, 2022 16 22-2854 Pending
Tennessee v. U.S. Department of Agriculture July 26, 2022 22 3:22-cv-00257 Pending
Texas v. NHTSA June 30, 2022 11 22-01144 Pending
Louisiana v. Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority June 29, 2022 2 22-30458 Motion for preliminary injunction granted (8/3/22)
Ohio v. EPA May 12, 2022 17 22-01081 Pending
Colville v. Becerra May 5, 2022 8 1:22-cv-00113 Pending
Missouri v. Biden May 5, 2022 2 3:22-cv-01213 Pending
Arizona v. Garland April 28, 2022 20 6:22-cv-01130 Pending
California v. U.S. Postal Service April 28, 2022 18 3:22-cv-02583 Stayed pending proceedings in a related case (8/1/22)
Alabama v. Mayorkas April 4, 2022 3 4:22-cv-00418 Stayed pending Supreme Court action (7/15/22)
Louisiana v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention April 3, 2022 24 22-30303 Preliminary injunction issued (5/20/22)
Florida v. Walensky March 29, 2022 21 8:22-cv-00718 Stayed pending an appeal in related litigation (6/2/22)
Louisiana v. U.S. Department of Energy March 17, 2022 12 22-60146 Pending
Indiana v. Biden March 4, 2022 14 1:22-cv-00430 Pending
Texas v. EPA February 28, 2022 15 22-1031 Pending
Texas v. Biden February 10, 2022 3 6:22-cv-00004 Pending
Arizona v. Walsh February 9, 2022 5 2:22-cv-00213 Pending
Texas v. Biden January 28, 2022 15 3:22-cv-00780 Pending
Louisiana v. Becerra December 21, 2021 24 3:21-cv-04370 Nationwide injunction granted (1/1/22).
Arizona v. Biden November 18, 2021 3 22-03272 Preliminary injunction reversed (7/5/22).
Louisiana v. Becerra November 15, 2021 14 21-30734 Stay on injunction granted in part, denied in part (1/18/22).
Connecticut v. FERC November 10, 2021 2 21-1198 Held in abeyance (7/27/22)
Missouri v. Biden November 10, 2021 10 21-1463 Preliminary injunction vacated (4/11/22).
Texas v. U.S. Department of Labor November 5, 2021 5 21A244
21A247
Supreme Court stayed the rule (1/13/22).
Florida v. Occupational Health and Safety Administration November 5, 2021 3 21A244
21A247
Consolidated with Texas v. U.S. Department of Labor (11/18/21).
Kentucky v. Occupational Health and Safety Administration November 5, 2021 7 21A244
21A247
Consolidated with Texas v. U.S. Department of Labor (11/18/21).
Missouri v. Biden November 5, 2021 11 21A244
21A247
Consolidated with Texas v. U.S. Department of Labor (11/18/21).
Louisiana v. Biden November 4, 2021 3 22-30019 Preliminary injunction granted in part, denied in part (12/16/21).
Kentucky v. Biden November 4, 2021 3 21-6147 Preliminary injunction granted (11/30/21).
Georgia v. Biden October 29, 2021 7 21-14269 Preliminary injunction granted (12/7/21). Preliminary injunction limited to plaintiff states (8/26/22).
Missouri v. Biden October 29, 2021 10 22-1104 Preliminary injunction granted (12/20/21).
Ohio v. Becerra October 25, 2021 12 21-04235 Circuit court denied states' motion for injunction (2/8/22).
Missouri v. Biden October 21, 2021 2 22-40110 Dismissed (8/3/22)
Tennessee v. U.S. Department of Education August 30, 2021 20 3:21-cv-00308 District court granted motion for preliminary injunction (7/15/22)
American Municipal Power v. FERC August 13, 2021 3 21-01173 Pending
Arizona v. EPA July 29, 2021 5 21-1159 Pending
Texas v. Yellen May 3, 2021 3 22-10560 District court enjoined enforcement of challenged tax provisions (4/8/22).
Oklahoma v. United States April 26, 2021 8 5:21-cv-00104 Dismissed by district court (6/3/22).
Texas v. Biden April 22, 2021 1 (+1 amicus) 4:21-cv-00579 Preliminary injunction granted (3/4/22). Stayed after change to policy.
Louisiana v. Biden April 22, 2021 10 22-30087 District court issued a preliminary injunction, injunction stayed on appeal (2/11/22).
Florida v. Becerra April 20, 2021 3 21-12243 Motion for preliminary injunction granted (6/18/21). Voluntarily dismissed by plaintiff states after expiration of policy.
Texas v. Biden April 13, 2021 2 21-954 Permanent injunction issued. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Biden administration (6/30/22).
Kentucky v. Yellen April 6, 2021 2 21-6108 District court enjoined the federal government from enforcing tax policy in American Rescue Plan Act against plaintiff states (9/24/21).
Texas v. United States April 6, 2021 2 22-58 Preliminary injunction issued. Appeal voluntarily dismissed after policy change. Case vacated (6/10/22).
West Virginia v. Department of the Treasury March 31, 2021 13 22-10168 Court enjoined the federal government from enforcing tax policy in American Rescue Plan Act (11/15/21)
Missouri v. Yellen March 29, 2021 1 (+ 19 amici) 21-2118 Dismissed (7/14/22)
Arizona v. Yellen March 25, 2021 1 (+ 21 amici) 21-16227 Pending
Louisana v. Biden March 24, 2021 13 21-30505 Motion for preliminary injunction granted (6/15/21)
Ohio v. Yellen March 22, 2021 1 (+20 amici) 21-03787 Permanent injunction granted (7/1/21)
American Municipal Power v. FERC March 16, 2021 2 21-1090 Pending
Texas v. Biden March 17, 2021 23 3:21-cv-00065 District court granted federal government's motion to dismiss (1/6/22).
Alabama v. U.S. Department of Commerce March 10, 2021 1 (+16 amici) 3:21-cv-00211 Dismissed
Arizona v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security March 8, 2021 2 21-16118 District court dismissed case
Missouri v. Biden March 8, 2021 12 21-03013 Federal government's motion to dismiss granted

Multistate lawsuits by administration, 1981-2022

The following chart compares the total number of multistate lawsuits filed against each presidential administration between 1981 and 2022, according to the State Litigation and AG Activity Database.

See also

Footnotes

Only the first few references on this page are shown above. Click to show more.
[show]
v  e
Biden Administration
Overviews
Cabinet
Members not requiring Senate confirmation

Members confirmed by the Senate


[show]
v  e
Ballotpedia
About
Editorial