Wednesday, August 24, 2022

Xav’d Higher Proportion in US

EXCLUSIVE: Vaccinated Making Up Higher Proportion of COVID-19 Metrics in US

EXCLUSIVE: maybe Vaccinated might be Making Up Higher Proportion of COVID-19 Metrics in US?

A laboratory technician works at a drive-through COVID-19 testing site in Louisville, Ky., on Jan. 10, 2022. (Jon Cherry/Getty Images)

Wow, maybe…

Vaccinated people are more likely than the unvaccinated in recent months to be a COVID-19 case, hospitalization, or death in 25 states, according to an Epoch Times investigation.?

In Kentucky in June, for example, 67 percent of the deaths were among the vaccinated, according to data obtained by The Epoch Times.

That same month, the vaccinated made up 65 percent of COVID-19 cases, 64 percent of COVID-19 hospitalizations, and 66 percent of COVID-19 deaths in Wisconsin.

The numbers are a drastic change from 2021.

After the mass vaccination campaign in the United States gained momentum, virtually every state reported unvaccinated people making up the vast majority of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths.

The numbers began tilting while the Delta virus variant was dominant. They have tilted even more since the Omicron variant displaced Delta, according to the newly collated numbers.

The Epoch Times compiled the data from state health department websites and databases. Some were obtained through records requests and have never before been made public.

The statistics underline how vaccines have increasingly performed worse as newer virus variants emerged, according to some experts.

They are "clear evidence that the vaccines are not working to prevent disease and death," Dr. Robert Malone, who helped invent the messenger RNA utilized in the two most widely-administered vaccines, told The Epoch Times.

Others argue the raw numbers don't contribute to analyzing vaccine effectiveness because they must first be adjusted to account for factors such as age.

"Unless one is able to correct for age and health status, this number is misleading, and does not lead to the conclusion vaccines are ineffective," Dr. Roger Klein, a policy adviser to The Heartland Institute and a former adviser to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other U.S. health agencies, told The Epoch Times via email.

Some states provide age-adjusted numbers, as recommended by the CDC.

Click the dots in the upper right part of the graph to unveil the full-screen option. Story continues below.

Data Reporting

Most states report at least one metric (cases, hospitalizations, deaths) by vaccination status. Some group the partially vaccinated with the unvaccinated when breaking down metrics.

As vaccines have proven increasingly unable to prevent COVID-19 infection in the Omicron era, a growing number of states have followed the CDC in separating those who have received a booster from the fully vaccinated.

Key terms as generally defined:

  • Unvaccinated: people who have gotten zero shots.
  • Partially vaccinated: people who have received one dose of the Moderna or Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines and people who have not seen 14 days elapse since their final dose of a primary series.
  • Fully vaccinated: people who have completed a primary series of a vaccine.
  • Boosted: people who have received at least one extra shot on top of the primary series.

The term fully vaccinated will be used in this article to refer to anybody who has received a primary series, regardless of whether they've received a booster. Not fully vaccinated refers to anybody who has not received a primary series. The term vaccinated, meanwhile, will refer to anyone who has received at least one dose of a vaccine.

Exceeded Expectations

In 14 states, the percentage of one or more so-called breakthrough metrics—post-vaccination cases, hospitalizations, and/or deaths—in recent months exceeded the percentage of the population that was vaccinated or fully vaccinated.

In most cases, that was a single metric. But in several, it was multiple, and in one, it was all three.

All data are from 2022. Only percentages were available for some states. Data for June were preferred, followed by data for July. Metrics are only listed if they exceed the percentage of vaccinated.

  1. Alaska* (March): 3,995 breakthrough cases (64.5 percent of cases)
    Vaccinated at the time: 59.1 percent of 5 and up
  2. Idaho+ (June 6–July 3): 89 breakthrough hospitalizations (53 percent)
    Fully vaccinated at the time: 52 percent
  3. Kentucky* (June): 55 breakthrough deaths (67 percent)
    Vaccinated at the time: 66 percent
  4. Louisiana– (Aug. 7): 61 percent breakthrough deaths
    Vaccinated at the time: 52 percent full, 6 percent partial
  5. Minnesota+ (June 5–July 3): 29,660 breakthrough cases (71 percent); 107 breakthrough deaths (80 percent)
    Fully vaccinated at the time: 66 percent
  6. Mississippi* (April 1–Aug. 1): 54 percent of breakthrough deaths
    Vaccinated at the time: 51.7 percent
  7. Oklahoma* (June 5–July 5): 277 breakthrough hospitalizations (64 percent)
    Vaccinated at the time, 5 and older: 51 percent
  8. Rhode Island+ (June): 22 breakthrough deaths (76 percent)
    Fully vaccinated at the time: 75.6 percent
  9. South Dakota* (June): 141 breakthrough hospitalizations (74 percent); 8 breakthrough deaths (66.6 percent)
    Vaccinated at the time: 58 percent
  10. Utah+ (June 5–June 26): 17,856 breakthrough cases (67 percent); 623 hospitalizations (67 percent)
    Fully vaccinated as of Aug. 8: 62 percent
  11. Vermont+ (June): 32 breakthrough hospitalizations (84 percent); 10 breakthrough deaths (91 percent)
    Fully vaccinated at the time: 78.6 percent
  12. West Virginia+ (July 31): 175 breakthrough hospitalizations (55 percent)
    Fully vaccinated at the time: 53.5 percent
  13. Wisconsin+** (June): 31,702 breakthrough cases (65 percent); 634 breakthrough hospitalizations (64 percent); 69 breakthrough deaths (66 percent)
    Fully vaccinated at the time: 61.5 percent
  14. Wyoming+ (June): 3,672 breakthrough cases (62 percent); 9 breakthrough deaths (52 percent)
    Fully vaccinated as of Aug. 15 (46.8 percent)

*vaccinated
+fully vaccinated
-unclear
**excludes partially vaccinated

Adjusted Data

Some states adjust the data before releasing it, which is meant to eliminate differences that result from one population being different from another. The most common adjustment is for age.

Age adjustment is used to compare populations directly "when the age distribution of who most commonly gets the disease, or seriously sick from the disease, is skewed," according to the Wisconsin Department of Health Services. For COVID-19, older populations are more likely to experience severe illness and death, and are also more likely to be vaccinated, experts say.

While the raw numbers look bad for the vaccinated, after adjusting for age, the rates of COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths in Wisconsin are higher for the unvaccinated throughout 2022 (cases have been higher in the vaccinated in recent months). That's similar to most of the other states that report data as rates, some of which also provide raw numbers.

Wisconsin's raw numbers were obtained through a records request.

Clinical trials and vaccine efficacy studies are the basis for determining vaccine effectiveness, Dr. Ryan Westergaard, chief medical officer for the state's Bureau of Communicable Diseases, said during a briefing, adding that the research shows that protection against severe disease and death remains high.

Studies can help control for biases such as vaccinated people being more likely to get tested at sites, which report data to the state, versus at home, which is not counted, Dr. Leisha Nolen, Utah's state epidemiologist, told The Epoch Times.

The studies show "the vaccines aren't doing as well at keeping us from getting infected, but they are still keeping people out of the hospital," Nolen told The Epoch Times.

Nolen singled out a study from researchers with the CDC and partner institutions, published in the agency's journal on July 22 (pdf).

Researchers reported data from a CDC-funded network of hospitals across 10 states from December 2021 to June 2022. The data showed that two doses of a vaccine, or a primary series, provided 57 to 68 percent protection against hospitalization through 149 days after vaccination, but dropped to as low as 24 percent 150 or more days after vaccination.

A third dose increased protection to 92 percent against BA.1, one of the subvariants, and 69 percent against BA.2, another subvariant. That protection dropped to 85 percent and 52 percent, respectively, after 120 or more days.

BA.5 is currently the dominant strain in the United States. Emerging data indicate the vaccines do not provide as much shielding against BA.4 and BA.5 as earlier strains.

Epoch Times Photo
Dr. Leisha Nolen, Utah's state epidemiologist, in an undated file photo. (Courtesy of Utah Department of Health)

Majority Vaccinated

In 11 other states, the vaccinated made up a majority of at least one metric, but the proportion of vaccinated did not exceed the percentage of vaccinated.

All data are from 2022. Percentages reported near or above 50 percent. Preference was for data in June, followed by data in July. Metrics with unvaccinated comprising a majority are not listed.

  1. Arizona+** (May): 62 percent breakthrough cases; 56.4 percent breakthrough hospitalizations
    Fully vaccinated as of June 1: 62 percent
  2. Connecticut+ (July 14–July 20): 2,116 breakthrough cases (56 percent); (July 25) 63 percent breakthrough hospitalizations
    Fully vaccinated at the time: 73 percent
  3. Georgia+ (June 4–July 1): 57,489 breakthrough cases (51 percent); 142 breakthrough deaths (54 percent)
    Fully vaccinated at the time: 56 percent
  4. Illinois+ (June 1–June 29): 205 breakthrough hospitalizations (49 percent); 195 breakthrough deaths (62 percent)
    Fully vaccinated at the time as of Aug. 15: 65 percent
  5. Maryland+ (June): 67.5 percent breakthrough cases, 70.6 percent breakthrough hospitalizations
    Fully vaccinated as of May 31: 76 percent
  6. Massachusetts+ (Aug. 2): 334 breakthrough hospitalized patients (60 percent); (June 25–July 1) 48 breakthrough deaths (77 percent)
    Fully vaccinated as of July 18: 79 percent
  7. Montana+ (May 14–July 8): 277 breakthrough hospitalizations (52 percent); 10 breakthrough deaths (48 percent)
    Fully vaccinated at the time: 53 percent
  8. New Mexico+** (July 4–Aug. 1): 15,520 breakthrough cases (62 percent); 398 breakthrough hospitalizations (55 percent); 45 breakthrough deaths (67 percent)
    Fully vaccinated as of Aug. 9: 69 percent
  9. Oregon+ (June): 27,092 breakthrough cases (59 percent); 83 breakthrough deaths (51 percent)
    Fully vaccinated as of Aug. 16: 70 percent
  10. Pennsylvania+ (April): 25,077 breakthrough cases (61 percent)
    Fully vaccinated at the time: 65 percent
  11. Tennessee- (July 1–July 8): 73 breakthrough hospitalizations (52 percent)
    Vaccinated at the time: 52 percent fully, 5.3 percent partially

*vaccinated
+fully vaccinated
-unclear
**excludes partially vaccinated

Epoch Times Photo
Dr. Steven Hatfill, a virologist and specialist physician, in Washington on March 28, 2020. (Courtesy of Vish Burra)

Other Studies

Vaccine-provided protection began waning against infection and, to a lesser extent, against severe illness in 2021, when the Delta variant was dominant. Since Omicron emerged in December 2021, that trend has quickened.

Omicron and its subvariants, described as more immune-evasive, are better at evading the protection from vaccines and prior infection. The vaccines have bestowed lower levels of initial protection, and the protection drops faster than before, research indicates. Known as natural immunity, the shielding from previous infection has held up better against Omicron, and was superior against Delta, according to studies.

Research on booster effectiveness has largely shown an initial increase in protection, followed by a quick decline. Other research, meanwhile, has indicated that vaccinated people are, at a certain point, more likely than unvaccinated people to get infected, which could relate to a phenomenon called immune imprinting.

Owing to the waning effectiveness, U.S. regulators have already cleared first and second boosters—as have many other countries—and are poised to authorize updated vaccines that target Omicron, describing the current formulation as not "well-matched" to the dominant variant.

"It's really not possible to predict what this virus is going to do, and I think it makes sense to be prepared with these boosters, which contain components of a BA.4 and BA.5 as well as the so-called archival Wuhan strain," Dr. Cody Meissner, one of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's external vaccine advisers, told The Epoch Times.

Some experts like Meissner say most people, including all adults, should still get vaccinated. Others note healthy individuals are at little risk from COVID-19, especially new variants, and say that the more recent data suggest little benefit for many.

That includes data from other parts of the world, including the United Kingdom, that have recorded the vaccinated as comprising the bulk of COVID-19 metrics.

"What we're looking at now is a sign of progress of a number of factors, primarily [that] the vaccinated can still catch and spread the COVID-19 virus," Dr. Steven Hatfill, a virologist, told The Epoch Times.

"The cost-benefit ratio now especially for the younger age groups has disappeared," he added later.

Remaining States

Of the remaining 25 states, eight reported the unvaccinated as making up more of the COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths.

All data are from 2022. Rates are listed when raw numbers were not available. When rates are listed, they are age-adjusted. June is preferred, followed by July.

  1. California** (June): 215,900 unvaccinated cases (51.7 percent); 5,057 unvaccinated hospitalizations (52 percent); 413 unvaccinated deaths (59 percent)
    Unvaccinated at the time: 20 percent
  2. Colorado**+ (June 26–July 3): 353.2 unvaccinated cases, 145.5 fully vaccinated, 244.3 boosted; 13 unvaccinated hospitalizations, 5.6 fully vaccinated, 4.9 boosted; (May 25–June 1): 54.7 unvaccinated deaths, 35.2 vaccinated, 18.1 boosted
    Unvaccinated at the time: 20.5 percent
  3. Indiana* (Jan. 1–late July): 264,779 unvaccinated cases (50.7 percent); 90 percent unvaccinated hospitalizations, 35 percent unvaccinated deaths
    Not fully vaccinated as of July 24: 45 percent
  4. Maine*+ (July 16–July 23): 333 not fully vaccinated cases, 68.5 fully vaccinated; 17 not fully vaccinated hospitalizations, 1.8 fully vaccinated; 0.5 not fully vaccinated deaths, 0 vaccinated
    Not fully vaccinated at the time: 25.2 percent
  5. Nebraska* (June 26–July 23): 11,048 not fully vaccinated cases (59 percent); 3,412 not fully vaccinated hospitalizations (97 percent); deaths unclear
    Not fully vaccinated at the time: 35 percent
  6. New Jersey*+ (as of July 16): 565 not fully vaccinated cases, 117 fully vaccinated, 199 boosted; 16 not fully vaccinated hospitalizations, 3 fully vaccinated, 5.5 boosted; 0.35 not fully vaccinated deaths, 0.06 fully vaccinated, 0.1 boosted
    Not fully vaccinated as of Aug. 17: 33 percent
  7. North Carolina* (July 31–Aug. 6): cases not available; 50.6 percent not fully vaccinated hospitalizations; death rate per 100,000 (June 30–July 30): 2.2 not fully vaccinated, 0.4 fully vaccinated, 0.2 boosted
    Not fully vaccinated as of Aug. 18: 37 percent
  8. Texas*+ (June 18–June 25): 334.4 unvaccinated cases, 163.9 fully vaccinated; hospitalizations not available; 0.5 unvaccinated deaths, 0.2 fully vaccinated
    Not fully vaccinated as of Aug. 10: 38 percent

*counts partially vaccinated with unvaccinated
+rates per 100,000
**excludes partially vaccinated

The 17 other states reported incomplete or insufficient data. To be included, states needed to report figures for at least one metric broken down by vaccination status, and a breakdown by time. States that would only provide data since the beginning of the pandemic were excluded. Some were still working on filling records requests by press time.

CDC Reporting

Earlier in the pandemic, when the unvaccinated were making up the bulk of the metrics across the country, U.S. officials and news outlets cited the state-level data as proof the vaccines worked.

The CDC still presents data on its website for COVID-19 cases and deaths by vaccination status. The data, based on statistics from 31 health departments, has repeatedly been offered by the agency as evidence of vaccine effectiveness.

The data is presented as incidence rates. Efforts to obtain the raw numbers have not yet been successful. According to the rates, the unvaccinated were 2.1 times more likely to test positive in June and five times more likely to die from COVID-19 in June than the fully vaccinated.

Separately, the CDC presents data on COVID-19 hospitalizations based on a hospital network in 14 states that it funds. But the agency has stopped listing fully vaccinated people. Instead, it lists only the unvaccinated and the boosted.

State officials are advised by the CDC not to report raw numbers by vaccination status, because "the percentage of vaccinated people among COVID-19 cases rises with either increasing vaccination coverage or decreasing vaccine effectiveness." Officials are recommended to report data as incidence rates or rate ratios, which adjust for differences between the unvaccinated and vaccinated populations such as age. The rates are described as "more stable and directly related to vaccine effectiveness."

Most states only report age-adjusted data or only present raw data in large chunks, such as from the beginning of the pandemic. The Epoch Times reviewed percentages and numbers from states that do report them, and obtained monthly or weekly breakdowns from some states. It also obtained unadjusted data from others that have never been reported before. Some states stopped reporting metrics by vaccination status after inquiries from The Epoch Times. Their reports were saved before they stopped.

Hilary Lin and Angel Yuan contributed to this report.

Zachary Stieber

Zachary Stieber covers U.S. and world news. He is based in Maryland.

Meiling Lee

Meiling Lee is a health reporter for The Epoch Times.



~A.

Tuesday, August 23, 2022

Not subject to approval , but ya never know…..

LOVE, LOVE, LOVE ;-)

WHAT CAN YOU PUBLISH?????

NOBODY IS LOOKING - BECAUSE THIS BLOG P R I V A T E

Stupid IS as Stupid Does....

 


...but WHICH ONE???

 This post was unpublished because it violates Blogger Community Guidelines. To republish, please update the content to adhere to guidelines.



The last 4  posts were unpublished because they violate Blogger Community Guidelines. ...but WHICH ONE???


   Hello,

        As you may know, our Community Guidelines (https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy) describe the boundaries for what we allow-- and don't allow-- on Blogger. Your post titled "How to Achieve Your Goals By Honoring Your Life - Good News Network" was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and have unpublished the URL http://adentex.blogspot.com/2017/04/how-to-achieve-your-goals-by-honoring.html, making it unavailable to blog readers.

   Why was your blog post unpublished?
   Your content has violated our Malware and Viruses policy. Please visit our Community Guidelines page linked in this email to learn more.

   If you are interested in republishing the post, please update the content to adhere to Blogger's Community Guidelines. Once the content is updated, you may republish it at https://www.blogger.com/go/appeal-post?blogId=5153690&postId=8540277600540211856. This will trigger a review of the post.

   For more information, please review the following resources:

   Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/terms
   Blogger Community Guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy

   Sincerely,

   The Blogger Team

Fuck, it's not even PUBLIC - but GUESS WHO's WATCHING????


1)   Hello,

   As you may know, our Community Guidelines (https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy) describe the boundaries for what we allow-- and don't allow-- on Blogger. Your post titled "New super-strain of E. coli resists all known antibiotics | Inhabitat - Sustainable Design Innovation, Eco Architecture, Green Building" was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and deleted the post, previously at http://adentex.blogspot.com/2015/12/new-super-strain-of-e-coli-resists-all.html.

   Why was your blog post deleted?
   Your content has violated our Regulated Goods and Services policy. Please visit our Community Guidelines page linked in this email to learn more.

   If you wish to request a review of the post, click the following link: https://www.blogger.com/go/appeal-post?blogId=5153690&postId=7672388289316538618. This will trigger a review of the post.

   We encourage you to review the full content of your blog posts to make sure they are in line with our standards as additional violations could result in termination of your blog.

   For more information, please review the following resources:

   Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/terms
   Blogger Community Guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy

2)   Hello,

        As you may know, our Community Guidelines (https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy) describe the boundaries for what we allow-- and don't allow-- on Blogger. Your post titled "Hospitals Slam the Industry by Creating Their Own Nonprofit Drug Company, Hitting the Market in 2019" was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and have unpublished the URL http://adentex.blogspot.com/2018/09/hospitals-slam-industry-by-creating.html, making it unavailable to blog readers.

   Why was your blog post unpublished?
   Your content has violated our Malware and Viruses policy. Please visit our Community Guidelines page linked in this email to learn more.

   If you are interested in republishing the post, please update the content to adhere to Blogger's Community Guidelines. Once the content is updated, you may republish it at https://www.blogger.com/go/appeal-post?blogId=5153690&postId=3012197549132376869. This will trigger a review of the post.

   For more information, please review the following resources:

   Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/terms
   Blogger Community Guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy

   Sincerely,


   The Blogger Team
   Sincerely,

   The Blogger Team

3)   Hello,

        As you may know, our Community Guidelines (https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy) describe the boundaries for what we allow-- and don't allow-- on Blogger. Your post titled "PedoGate Update: Global Elite's Pedophile Empire Is Crumbling... Will It Ever Crash? | Joachim Hagopian | Pulse | LinkedIn" was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and have unpublished the URL http://adentex.blogspot.com/2018/06/pedogate-update-global-elites-pedophile.html, making it unavailable to blog readers.

   Why was your blog post unpublished?
   Your content has violated our Malware and Viruses policy. Please visit our Community Guidelines page linked in this email to learn more.

   If you are interested in republishing the post, please update the content to adhere to Blogger's Community Guidelines. Once the content is updated, you may republish it at https://www.blogger.com/go/appeal-post?blogId=5153690&postId=2361535159704292360. This will trigger a review of the post.

   For more information, please review the following resources:

   Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/terms
   Blogger Community Guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy

   Sincerely,

   The Blogger Team



--
Posted By ~A. to A.d.Ventures at Aug 23, 2022, 7:32 AM

Unsubscribe from new post emails for this blog.

NOT PUBLIC!!!

THis 


[A.d.Ventures] wondering...

This BLOG is NOT PUBLIC


This BLOG IS PRIVATE


THIS BLOG IS FOR ME ONLY




WHO THE H(ec)L ARE YOU???






--
Posted By ~A. to A.d.Ventures at Aug 23, 2022, 7:41 AM

Unsubscribe from new post emails for this blog.

wondering...

This BLOG is NOT PUBLIC


This BLOG IS PRIVATE


THIS BLOG IS FOR ME ONLY




WHO THE Heck ARE YOU???

and why was it DEPUBLISHED???




UNPUBLISHED

Fuck, it's not even PUBLIC - but GUESS WHO's WATCHING????

1)   Hello,

   As you may know, our Community Guidelines (https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy) describe the boundaries for what we allow-- and don't allow-- on Blogger. Your post titled "New super-strain of E. coli resists all known antibiotics | Inhabitat - Sustainable Design Innovation, Eco Architecture, Green Building" was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and deleted the post, previously at http://adentex.blogspot.com/2015/12/new-super-strain-of-e-coli-resists-all.html.

   Why was your blog post deleted?
   Your content has violated our Regulated Goods and Services policy. Please visit our Community Guidelines page linked in this email to learn more.

   If you wish to request a review of the post, click the following link: https://www.blogger.com/go/appeal-post?blogId=5153690&postId=7672388289316538618. This will trigger a review of the post.

   We encourage you to review the full content of your blog posts to make sure they are in line with our standards as additional violations could result in termination of your blog.

   For more information, please review the following resources:

   Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/terms
   Blogger Community Guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy

2)   Hello,

        As you may know, our Community Guidelines (https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy) describe the boundaries for what we allow-- and don't allow-- on Blogger. Your post titled "Hospitals Slam the Industry by Creating Their Own Nonprofit Drug Company, Hitting the Market in 2019" was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and have unpublished the URL http://adentex.blogspot.com/2018/09/hospitals-slam-industry-by-creating.html, making it unavailable to blog readers.

   Why was your blog post unpublished?
   Your content has violated our Malware and Viruses policy. Please visit our Community Guidelines page linked in this email to learn more.

   If you are interested in republishing the post, please update the content to adhere to Blogger's Community Guidelines. Once the content is updated, you may republish it at https://www.blogger.com/go/appeal-post?blogId=5153690&postId=3012197549132376869. This will trigger a review of the post.

   For more information, please review the following resources:

   Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/terms
   Blogger Community Guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy

   Sincerely,

   The Blogger Team
   Sincerely,

   The Blogger Team

3)   Hello,

        As you may know, our Community Guidelines (https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy) describe the boundaries for what we allow-- and don't allow-- on Blogger. Your post titled "PedoGate Update: Global Elite's Pedophile Empire Is Crumbling... Will It Ever Crash? | Joachim Hagopian | Pulse | LinkedIn" was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and have unpublished the URL http://adentex.blogspot.com/2018/06/pedogate-update-global-elites-pedophile.html, making it unavailable to blog readers.

   Why was your blog post unpublished?
   Your content has violated our Malware and Viruses policy. Please visit our Community Guidelines page linked in this email to learn more.

   If you are interested in republishing the post, please update the content to adhere to Blogger's Community Guidelines. Once the content is updated, you may republish it at https://www.blogger.com/go/appeal-post?blogId=5153690&postId=2361535159704292360. This will trigger a review of the post.

   For more information, please review the following resources:

   Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/terms
   Blogger Community Guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy

   Sincerely,

   The Blogger Team

Friday, August 19, 2022

Thames river heritage park - Boat Tours, not including the Taxi...


Covid Cover-Up: It was all a F*cking lie | Redacted with Natali and Clay...

https://youtu.be/Y8LybY1ZA4o

Suckers…..
~A.

Thursday, August 11, 2022

Saturday, August 06, 2022

Wednesday, July 27, 2022

?Respond to Past Trauma...

INFJ Trauma: How INFJs Deal with and Respond to Past Trauma

INFJ Trauma: How INFJs Deal with and Respond to Past Trauma

When it comes to experiencing trauma everyone has their own ways of handling and coping with what they go through. Of course it often requires certain help from others and serious trauma can also require therapy to find tools and ways to move through it. There are so many different types of trauma, some happen so subtly that we don't even realize we have endured a truly traumatic experience. It can be difficult to process, especially when you are still involved in the trauma which is bringing you down. This is something which can affect someone's behavior long-term, and make certain personality types behave in ways which don't seem to really fit who they normally are. This is why it is important to understand the different ways that trauma can change someone or alter their behavior.

When it comes to experiencing trauma this can certainly alter the behavior of an INFJ and cause them to appear different from their norm. INFJs can certainly bottle up this trauma, since they have a tendency to bury negative feelings. They struggle to fully process these instances, and can try to push forward as if nothing has even happened. INFJs don't like feeling as if they are a burden and can even experience immense guilt from their trauma. This is why it can be hard for them to recognize when something is truly wrong, and will want to cover this up with distractions and other intentions. INFJs who spend their lives not dealing with their trauma can certainly become more toxic versions of the type, which is why it is important to understand the difference. Having gone through something like this, the INFJ might not behave like themselves, especially if they do not have the means of seeking help and bettering their situation.

INFJ Childhood Trauma

INFJs who have endured trauma from childhood can really struggle to process or move on from this. They likely hold onto those feelings, and will blame themselves when things go wrong. It can also cause the INFJ to fear being abandoned, and so they continue to pretend like they don't have this trauma sitting on their chest. For the INFJ child who has gone through something traumatic it often becomes easier to bury and forget that pain. They repress those feelings and attempt to override them, which can cause it to fester and hurt them even more. The INFJ child can appear like an "old soul" and this makes it easier for people to forget that they are actually still a child. They need to be cared for and they need to have people who will help them express those emotions and feel safe doing so.

How Trauma Changes The INFJ

The INFJ who has been through trauma can be somewhat toxic when it comes to relationships. They are likely to have a hard time with abandonment issues, and don't want to lose the people they love. This type of INFJ might latch onto people who understand and appreciate them, not wanting to lose what they have found in this person. They can show toxic behaviors towards them, trying to find any way possible to keep that person in their lives. This is not something that a healthy INFJ will do or express, and so their trauma likely causes their more manipulative talents to express themselves. The INFJ doesn't do this to be cruel, they just feel a sense of pain and need, and want to keep that person in their lives in order to bring them comfort. Since they haven't found a way to process their trauma, they often don't realize what makes them feel uneasy just being with themselves.

The INFJ who has experienced trauma can also find themselves in their shadow, which makes them much more reckless. Instead of trusting in their intuition this INFJ will rely on things that feel good in the moment. They seek out ways to reward themselves, not really thinking about what will happen in the future. They aren't as good at seeing around the corner and figuring out how to accomplish their goals and improve their lives. Instead they focus on things that feel good and might even struggle to keep track of their own mental and physical health in the process.

INFJ Coping with Trauma

INFJs can often have a go-to response of burying negative emotions, and seeking out ways to help others instead. They don't find it easy to really process this pain, since spending too much time on themselves can feel selfish. INFJs don't like forcing themselves to be the center of attention, and vulnerability can actually be frightening for them. INFJs who have endured trauma can start to feel like they aren't good enough, and will attempt to find ways to fit into some sort of perfect image. The best way for the INFJ to cope with their trauma is to take note of it, and to stop drawing towards people who allow them to abandon their own needs. Their fear of abandonment is likely to become worse because of this trauma, and so the idea of sharing it with someone is frightening. INFJs need to be okay with accepting help, both from their loved ones and from a professional. Sometimes having that outside perspective can give them a sense of not being so alone, as well as recognizing that they deserve to take time for themselves as well. Putting their own needs first is not a bad thing, and even helps them to become more compassionate and rewarding friends and loved ones. For the INFJ coping with trauma is something which can take time and even space to themselves, or else they become too fixated on helping those around them. Having someone who has been through something similar (especially if it's another INFJ), can really help guide the INFJ through the process and make them feel like they are not strange or alone.

Tuesday, July 26, 2022

Gates Funds China’s Scientist Recruitment Project


Bill Gates Funds China's Scientist Recruitment Project

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is giving money to the Chinese regime amid the regime's bid to tempt foreign scientists into the country.

Bill Gates's foundation issued a $100,000 grant in June to the Foreign Talent Research Center (FTRC) of China's Ministry of Science and Technology, according to the Gates Foundation's website, the National Pulse first reported.

The funding is to help the Chinese regime organize a forum hosted by Zhongguancun—China's state-sponsored Silicon Valley—on "pandemic preparedness and response." The forum has featured top leaders of the regime as speakers including, in its 2021 event, regime leader Xi Jinping.

While the 2022 forum will feature discussion topics such as global health and supporting pandemic-impacted "disadvantaged populations," the agency affiliated with the Communist regime that's sponsoring the event, FTRC, oversees the hiring of foreign talents in science and engineering for China's strategic goals such as military-civil integration.

Meanwhile, the forum's objectives go beyond talking about technology and health topics: as the organizers say, they aim to "necessary to earnestly study and understand the spirit of the General Secretary's [2021] speech" and build a technological hub in "serving the national strategy."

Warnings of China's Threat

The foundation's commitment to bolstering China's scientific advancement came amid mounting warnings of the threat the regime poses to the United States and the West.

Leaders from the UK and U.S. domestic intelligence agencies delivered a rare joint statement on July 6, warning that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is the greatest threat to the international order.

FBI Director Christopher Wray said the greatest challenge to the international order is the CCP, which seeks to undermine the United States, its allies, and its partners.

Meanwhile, MI5 Director General Ken McCallum detailed threats posed by the CCP in relation to covert theft, forced technology transfers, research exploitation, and cyberattacks that target virtually every sector of society.

U.S. officials have also warned that the Chinese regime uses recruitment programs, such as the "thousand talents plan," to lure foreign academics to work in China, a process that facilitates the transfer of technology and know-how to the country.

The Trump administration launched the "China Initiative" in 2018 to combat the Chinese regime's state-sponsored espionage and theft of trade secrets. The program led to the prosecution of some two dozen U.S. academics, most of them of Chinese origin, who were alleged to have concealed funding ties with Chinese institutions and state-backed recruitment plans.

The Biden administration shut down the program in February amid criticisms of the program as racial profiling. Thus, chilling scientific exchanges between the United States and China surged.

Ties With Beijing

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation set up its Beijing office in 2007 and has since worked with the Chinese government on several domestic projects in the country, as reported by CNN.

Over the past three decades, Gates has visited China at least "a dozen times," forging friendly relations with its top leaders.

In 2015, Xi met with Gates. Last year, Xi wrote a letter to Gates, thanking him for his efforts in combating the virus that started in the country Xi presides over. 

"I deeply appreciate the act of generosity of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and your letter of solidarity to the Chinese people at such an important moment," the letter read.

It came after the foundation committed to funding up to $100 million for the global bid to tackle the COVID-19 outbreak.

The foundation at the time informed that it would allocate $20 million to organizations like the World Health Organization, the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Protection, the National Health Commission of China, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Andrew Thornebrooke contributed to this report.

Hannah Ng is a reporter covering U.S. and China news. She holds a master's degree in international and development economics from the University of Applied Science Berlin.